One of the most
important responsibilities for interns in Congressional offices is to provide
personal tours of the United States Capitol to constituents visiting
Washington. The tour route begins in the Crypt, weaves through the Old Supreme
Court Chamber, and then visits the venerated Rotunda, with its impressive
paintings of early American history and larger-than-life statues of
larger-than-life leaders such as Reagan, Lincoln, King Jr., and Washington.
After the
rotunda, the tour moves into the Old Senate Chamber. From 1810-1859, during the
“Golden Age of the Senate”, the nation’s upper legislative body debated issues ranging
from westward expansion to slavery in this hallowed hall.
While each Hill
intern has his or her own signature style and approach to giving a Capitol
tour, almost every single intern-turned-tour guide will tell the same story before
entering the Old Senate Chamber: in May 1856, a staunchly anti-slavery Senator,
Charles Sumner, had just finished giving a two-day long speech on the Senate
floor, decrying the evils of slavery and calling into question the morality of
anyone who supported the institution. A certain Representative from South
Carolina, Preston Brooks, took exception to Sumner’s words, and decided to march
across the capitol building, into the Senate Chamber, and brutally beat Sumner
over the head with a cane as retaliation for his words.
The United
States Senate website describes the state of the nation at the time of Brooks’
bloody attack on Sumner as “suffering from a breakdown of reasoned discourse
that this event symbolized.” Rather than relying on debate to resolve our
nation’s most pressing public policy issues, men resorted to barbaric acts of
violence, and eventually war, to settle their problems.
On June 14,
2017, a man approached a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, and opened
fire with a semi-automatic weapon, intending to kill as many of the Republican
lawmakers assembled there as possible. While we cannot be truly sure of his
motives, an examination of his actions leading up to this event indicate that
his political disagreements with the lawmakers on the field, along with some
level of mental instability, combined to cause his violent outburst.
Almost
immediately after Wednesday’s attack, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle
displayed refreshing cooperation in condemning the attack and calling for a
reduction in the incendiary political rhetoric that has become commonplace in
our society.
While I would
like to believe that America today is a long way away from the “breakdown of
reasoned discourse” that caused a man to assault another on the floor of the
Senate, I believe that the events of this week should serve as a valuable
reminder of the necessity of respectful dialogue in our current political
climate, and that no matter how divisive the issue, there must always be an
opportunity for peaceful resolution.
By: Drew Cooper